Skip to content
Korean PDRN

PDRN clinical evidence timeline

15 published studies of PDRN and polynucleotides, in date order, with what each one tested, how many people took part and what it cannot tell you.

15

Studies listed

5

Injection trials

2

Topical human studies

5

Reviews

Every record was checked against PubMed on 11 November 2026. Findings are the authors' reported results. This page is general information, not medical advice, and does not recommend any treatment or product.

  1. 2001

  2. 2004

  3. 2014

  4. 2017

    • Review

      Pharmacological activity and clinical use of PDRN

      Squadrito F, Bitto A, Irrera N, et al. Front Pharmacol. 2017;8:224. PMID 28491036.

      Design:
      Narrative review.
      What it reported:
      Describes PDRN as a registered medicine made from salmon-trout or chum-salmon sperm DNA, with chain sizes of 50 to 1,500 kDa, and sets out the proposed mechanism: activating the adenosine A2A receptor and supplying building blocks for DNA through the salvage pathway.
      Limits:
      A review by researchers who ran several of the PDRN trials. It defines pharmaceutical PDRN; a cosmetic labelled PDRN need not match that definition.
  5. 2020

    • Review

      The effects of polydeoxyribonucleotide on wound healing and tissue regeneration: a systematic review of the literature

      Colangelo MT, Galli C, Guizzardi S Regen Med. 2020 (published 6 Aug 2020). PMID 32757710.

      Design:
      Systematic review of laboratory, animal and clinical studies to March 2020. 34 studies included.
      What it reported:
      The included studies were consistent with PDRN supporting tissue repair through the salvage pathway and the adenosine A2A receptor, with promising results for wound healing time and few reported side effects.
      Limits:
      Most included studies were laboratory or animal work, and the clinical ones used injections or medical products.
    • Injection

      Comparison of the effects of polynucleotide and hyaluronic acid fillers on periocular rejuvenation: a randomized, double-blind, split-face trial

      Lee YJ, Kim HT, Lee YJ, et al. J Dermatolog Treat. 2022;33(1):254-260 (online 2020). PMID 32248707.

      Design:
      Randomised, double-blind, split-face trial against a hyaluronic acid filler. 27 people, three injection sessions two weeks apart.
      What it reported:
      Overall appearance scores did not differ between the two sides. Improvement in elasticity, hydration, roughness and pore volume was higher on the polynucleotide side. No serious adverse events were reported.
      Limits:
      Small, with no placebo side, and it tested long-chain polynucleotide filler injected around the eyes by clinicians.
  6. 2021

  7. 2022

  8. 2024

    • Review

      The effectiveness of polynucleotides in esthetic medicine: a systematic review

      Lampridou S, Bassett S, Cavallini M, Christopoulos G J Cosmet Dermatol. 2025;24(2):e16721 (online Dec 2024). PMID 39645667.

      Design:
      Systematic review of studies published 2010 to 2023. 9 studies, 219 patients.
      What it reported:
      Polynucleotide injections showed promising results for wrinkles, texture and elasticity, with mild and short-lived side effects.
      Limits:
      The reviewers rated the nine studies as low to moderate quality, found no agreement on how best to use the injections, and called for rigorous trials.
  9. 2025

  10. 2026

    • Topical (skin)

      Topical medium-length PDRN enhances dermal extracellular matrix repair in photodamaged skin via PI3K-Akt/TGF-β-regulated pathways

      Ye R, Wang Q, Du L, et al. PLoS One. 2026;21(7):e0350905. PMID 42430369.

      Design:
      Laboratory and skin-model work plus a randomised, double-blind, split-face study over 28 days. Split-face study of a 0.1% PDRN eye cream against 0.1% retinol.
      What it reported:
      The authors report signal from the PDRN preparation reaching living layers of the epidermis in skin models, and about twice the improvement of retinol in wrinkles around the eyes and in skin thickness and density, with good tolerability.
      Limits:
      The first peer-reviewed human comparison of a topical PDRN cream. It lasted 28 days, tested one specific preparation, and several authors work for the company linked to it. It needs independent repetition.
    • Review

      Polynucleotides and polydeoxyribonucleotides for skin rejuvenation, postoperative scar prevention, and wound healing: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials

      Alhussain AM, et al. Cureus. 2026;18(7). PMID 42572627.

      Design:
      Systematic review limited to randomised clinical trials.
      What it reported:
      Brings together the randomised trials of polynucleotides and PDRN across skin rejuvenation, scar prevention after surgery and wound healing.
      Limits:
      A review is only as strong as the trials in it, and most trials above are small and use injections.
    • Topical (skin)

      Real-world cases using phyto polydeoxyribonucleotide (PDRN) serum

      Wu Y, Guénin S, Fung E, et al. J Drugs Dermatol. 2026;25(9):15491s2-15491s14. PMID 42696342.

      Design:
      Case series in a journal supplement. 8 women aged 28 to 68 after laser, microneedling or peels.
      What it reported:
      Doctors reported that a serum with PDRN made by Lactobacillus bacteria, used after procedures, was well tolerated and useful in aftercare.
      Limits:
      Eight selected cases with no control group, in a supplement. The PDRN is bacterial, not salmon-derived, and the serum has many other ingredients.

How to read this timeline

  • Route matters most. An injection places PDRN in or under the skin. A cream has to cross the skin barrier first, so injection results do not carry over.
  • PDRN and polynucleotides are related, not identical. Both are DNA fragments, usually from salmon or trout. Polynucleotide (PN) fillers use longer chains. We list both because clinics and brands often cite them together.
  • Size and controls. A trial of 20 people can show a signal but not settle a question. A study with no placebo or comparison side cannot separate the product from time and aftercare.
  • Who ran it. Several studies have authors employed by companies that make or sell the product tested. That does not make a result wrong; it means it needs independent repetition.

How this list was built

We searched PubMed for randomised trials with PDRN or polynucleotide in the title, added the reviews and topical studies cited in our guides, and checked each record's title, year, journal, study type, quoted numbers and retraction status. It is a selected timeline of landmark and frequently cited studies, not a complete systematic review. Trials in joints, tendons and gums are left out because they do not concern skin.

You are welcome to cite or reuse this timeline with a link to this page. If you spot an error or a study we should add, tell us.

Read next

Explore Korean PDRN

Start with the best PDRN skincare in the UK or browse top rated products, reviews and routines.