Typically used at routine step 12.
Devices are assessed differently from formulations. What matters is the classification the device is sold under, what the manufacturer actually claims, the contraindications listed in the instructions, and whether it is supplied for the UK market with appropriate documentation. Evidence quality varies widely between device categories, and marketing language frequently outruns it, so we record what is documented and flag where it is not.
Editorial research review
medicube
The established Medicube all-rounder: six functions (Booster, MC, Air Shot, Derma Shot, sonic vibration and LED) in one handset. A sensible choice if you want the core Medicube routine without paying for the X2 additions.
Editorial research review
medicube
Medicube's newest multi-mode device, adding Dual, Sheet Mask and app-guided modes to the Booster Pro formula. The upgrade is about convenience and options; independent evidence for these specific modes is not available.
Editorial research review
medicube
Medicube's radiofrequency plus microcurrent device. RF has the strongest research base of the at-home modalities for skin laxity, but results from clinic devices cannot be assumed for this one.
Editorial research review
A non-Korean premium microcurrent comparator with an Anti-Shock system that adjusts output to skin resistance, app-guided routines and four microcurrent types. The manual is unusually clear about precautions.
Editorial research review
medicube
A compact, lower-commitment Medicube option with swappable heads including a cleansing brush. It is not a smaller Booster Pro: the mode set is different and simpler.
Editorial research review
A non-Korean comparison device: a compact, long-established microcurrent handset. Microcurrent evidence is still limited and consistency matters more than the brand.
Editorial research review
Therabody
A non-Korean comparison device: a wireless LED mask using red (633 nm), infrared (830 nm) and blue (415 nm) light. LED is one of the better-studied home modalities, though study quality varies.
We currently track 7 published products here. Every entry is compiled from manufacturer ingredient disclosures, published cosmetic science literature and UK retailer listings. We do not run clinical trials, and we do not publish a product until its formulation details have been checked against a source we can cite.
Results from cosmetic products are formulation-dependent and vary between people. Read our review methodology, browse the ingredient explainers or compare options in the comparison tool.
For a full step-by-step order for your skin type, see the routine guides. To narrow by skin type and concern, use the product finder, or browse every step on the product types index. Scoring is explained in our review methodology.
Start with the best PDRN skincare in the UK or browse top rated products, reviews and routines.
